# Contradiction in DvQuantified definition **Category:** [RM](https://discourse.openehr.org/c/rm/42) **Created:** 2020-12-24 14:36 UTC **Views:** 634 **Replies:** 3 **URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/contradiction-in-dvquantified-definition/1191 --- ## Post #1 by @Bert_Verhees Sorry to bother you the day before Christmas about this tiny issue. I hope you are all in good health In DvQuantified class is a little but disturbing error: **less_than** *alias* "<" ( other: `DV_QUANTIFIED[1]` ): `Boolean` I thinkt the Post result contradicts with the description - *Post_result*: `Result = magnitude < other.magnitude` - True if `other` is less than this Quantified object. Based on comparison of `magnitude`. Please have a look at that when you have time. Enjoy your holidays Best Regards Bert Verhees --- ## Post #2 by @thomas.beale Bert, good catch. I have no idea how that error got in there - it was in more than one class. I think I got them all. There is now a CR (in your name ;) - [SPECRM-101](https://openehr.atlassian.net/browse/SPECRM-101). Feel free to review and update anything if I have made an error. The [changes are visible here](https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/data_types.html#_dv_quantified_class). The sense of the comparison signs in the `less_than()` post-conditions in DV_DATE, DV_TIME and DV_DATE_TIME were also wrong. --- ## Post #3 by @Bert_Verhees Thanks, Thomas, it sounds like a minor thing, but sometimes this can be confusing if it is not well defined which object should be smaller. So, I am happy that you repaired it, and having my name to it, well, I sometimes need a bit of marketing :-) Best regards Bert --- ## Post #4 by @thomas.beale Everyone who fixes things in openEHR [gets recognised](https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/data_types.html#_amendment_record) ... --- **Canonical:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/contradiction-in-dvquantified-definition/1191 **Original content:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/contradiction-in-dvquantified-definition/1191