# Cleaning up the wiki...
**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586
**Category:** Technical (archive)
**Created:** [25 May 2015 09:57 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586 "2015-05-25T09:57:14Z")
**Posts on this page:** 10
**Page:** 3
### Author:  [@Jan-Marc\_Verlinden1](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Jan-Marc_Verlinden1)
#### Post date: [11 June 2015 13:11 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586/41 "2015-06-11T13:11:29Z")
How would we get more than the five provided votes per person? Would love to vote more..:-).
This e-mail message is intended exclusively for the addressee(s). Please inform us immediately if you are not the addressee.
---
### Author:  [@Arild\_Faxvaag1](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Arild_Faxvaag1)
#### Post date: [11 June 2015 13:45 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586/42 "2015-06-11T13:45:54Z")
done signing up and upvoting.
---
### Author:  [@Cavero\_Barca\_Carlos](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Cavero_Barca_Carlos)
#### Post date: [11 June 2015 15:12 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586/43 "2015-06-11T15:12:51Z")
Done! 90 followers 🙂
Regards.
Carlos.
---
### Author:  [@Seref](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Seref)
#### Post date: [11 June 2015 15:41 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586/44 "2015-06-11T15:41:44Z")
Thanks, can someone write a comment (shamelessly in capitals..) under the highest voted (16 the moment) question asking visitors to NOT to vote for questions with \> 10 votes? My user can’t do it for some reason.
There are ~19 wasted points that could have been used on other questions a.t.m and people will just arrive and keep upvoting the top 5 ones. (This is a weird design; if \> 10 votes do not help, why let users vote beyond 10 at that stage?)
---
### Author:  [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [11 June 2015 15:54 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586/45 "2015-06-11T15:54:47Z")
I would not do so. This is not an automatic process, this first phase is just a way of filtering proposals. For sure the people in StackExchange will evaluate each proposal in detail, and if they find that votes and questions are clearly addressed or governed the proposal won’t be accepted.
---
### Author:  [@Seref](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Seref)
#### Post date: [11 June 2015 15:58 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586/46 "2015-06-11T15:58:25Z")
You’re probably right. It is hard to find the acceptable level of strategic voting 🙂
---
### Author:  [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [12 June 2015 14:20 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586/47 "2015-06-12T14:20:02Z")
Getting closer still in our effort to establish an openEHR area in StackExchange.
[http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/87508/openehr)
We now have oodles of followers (96) and enough questions but do not have enough upvotes on 9 remaining questions to pass to the next stage.
If you have not yet voted, please do so. Sort the list of questions by votes and scroll down until you hit those with zero or more votes - these are the ones that need yo be upvoted to get us over the finishing line. Don’t worry if you are not actually that interested in the question - it is just the numbers that count at this point.
We still need about 70 votes in total. If 15 people cast their 5 votes tactically we will make it!!
Ian
---
### Author:  [@yampeku](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/yampeku)
#### Post date: [12 June 2015 15:50 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586/48 "2015-06-12T15:50:23Z")
I think it could be also interesting to answer the questions we know
the answer for, to show there are also experts and discussion out
there ;D
---
### Author:  [@thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/thomas.beale)
#### Post date: [12 June 2015 17:17 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586/49 "2015-06-12T17:17:51Z")
I have not figured out whether that's what they want or not - but if we assume that the 'example' questions don't get deleted by the admins, you are probably right. Maybe we just start using it.
- thomas
---
### Author:  [@thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/thomas.beale)
#### Post date: [12 June 2015 18:11 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586/50 "2015-06-12T18:11:27Z")
If you look at 'hardware-recommendations', another new StackExchange area in the 'Commitment' phase (openEHR is in the 'initial' phase), the questions generally have no answers yet, and also they are 'locked', and it seems that all you can do is get enough 'committers' (people who sign up in some way to the specific area).
It's a strange process to be sure, but I think the main thing we need to do is to get votes on those last 8 questions and see what happens next.
- thomas
[Previous page](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/cleaning-up-the-wiki/15586.md?page=2)