# BRIDG

**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704
**Category:** Technical (archive)
**Created:** [16 November 2007 09:11 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704 "2007-11-16T09:11:07Z")
**Posts on this page:** 9
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gavin\_Brelstaff](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/e495f1/32.png) [@Gavin\_Brelstaff](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Gavin_Brelstaff)
#### Post date: [16 November 2007 09:11 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704/1 "2007-11-16T09:11:07Z")

</div>

Is this to be taken any notice of:

[http://www.bridgmodel.org/](http://www.bridgmodel.org/)

?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tim\_Cook2](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/57b2e6/32.png) [@Tim\_Cook2](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Tim_Cook2)
#### Post date: [16 November 2007 09:59 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704/2 "2007-11-16T09:59:36Z")

</div>

Well, like most things that question is context dependent. 🙂

It is important (mostly because it involves the 800 lb. gorilla called  
HL7) but it is also important if you plan to be able to export your data  
out for research. They will likely create "the" format for that.

"The goal of the BRIDG Project is to produce a shared view of the  
dynamic and static semantics of a common domain-of-interest,  
specifically the domain of protocol-driven research and its associated  
regulatory artifacts."

They are very focused on one aspect (and may even be focused on only the  
US?) of clinical data. IMHO - just another silo!

But for now they should be relegated to the Do Not Disturb pile. The  
even admit that the next 12 - 18 months will be one of constant change.

My $.02.

Cheers,  
Tim

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tim\_Cook2](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/57b2e6/32.png) [@Tim\_Cook2](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Tim_Cook2)
#### Post date: [16 November 2007 13:41 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704/3 "2007-11-16T13:41:08Z")

</div>

All,

I have tried (on this and other lists) to set my preferences so that I  
receive a copy of my own email. Mostly because I have no clue of what  
I sent to which mailing list I guess. ☹

I NEVER seem to recieve a copy of the email I sent.

Now I really think that Mailman is probably the best mailing list  
manager available. However, this issue seems to be pervasive across  
many mailing lists and many domains.

It is VERY frustrating since I need to keep track of what I said where  
otherwise I'll be VERY confused.

Thoughts? Solutions?

Cheers,  
Tim

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Seref](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/seref/32/13_2.png) [@Seref](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Seref)
#### Post date: [16 November 2007 13:57 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704/4 "2007-11-16T13:57:01Z")

</div>

Ah, finally someone else! I can not get the messages that I send to  
list. When I check it using the list archives, I see my mail there, but  
since I can not get my own mail, I can not be sure without checking the  
archive whether others got it or not.  
If you resolve this please let us know please.

All the best  
Seref

Tim Cook wrote:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [16 November 2007 14:16 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704/5 "2007-11-16T14:16:27Z")

</div>

Tim Cook schreef:

> All,
> 
> I have tried (on this and other lists) to set my preferences so that I  
> receive a copy of my own email. Mostly because I have no clue of what  
> I sent to which mailing list I guess. ☹
> 
> I NEVER seem to recieve a copy of the email I sent.
> 
> Now I really think that Mailman is probably the best mailing list  
> manager available. However, this issue seems to be pervasive across  
> many mailing lists and many domains.
> 
> It is VERY frustrating since I need to keep track of what I said where  
> otherwise I'll be VERY confused.
> 
> Thoughts? Solutions?
> 
> Cheers,  
> Tim
> 
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_  
> openEHR-technical mailing list  
> openEHR-technical@openehr.org  
> [http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical](http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical)

must be something in mailman's settings, I recieve every mail, but  
sometimes it takes half an hour, this also wonders me.  
Bert

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/thomas.beale/32/35_2.png) [@thomas.beale](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/thomas.beale)
#### Post date: [16 November 2007 17:13 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704/6 "2007-11-16T17:13:26Z")

</div>

I don't think there is anythign magic in mailman - as far as I know it  
just sends a copy of the post to every subscriber, which includes the  
sender. So I wonder if you have some filter running or some junk / spam  
rule that is mistakenly killing the received emails?

- thomas

Tim Cook wrote:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Greg\_Caulton](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/g/f14d63/32.png) [@Greg\_Caulton](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Greg_Caulton)
#### Post date: [16 November 2007 17:24 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704/7 "2007-11-16T17:24:56Z")

</div>

There is a few related administrator settings not sure what OpenEHR  
has them set to of course:

1) [] Conceal the member's address  
2) [X] Acknowledge the member's posting  
3) [] Do not send a copy of a member's own post  
4) [X] Filter out duplicate messages to list members (if possible)

Greg

[http://www.patientos.org](http://www.patientos.org)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)
#### Post date: [16 November 2007 23:16 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704/8 "2007-11-16T23:16:03Z")

</div>

There is an option in the mailman settings that you can set for each list:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tim\_Cook2](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/57b2e6/32.png) [@Tim\_Cook2](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Tim_Cook2)
#### Post date: [17 November 2007 20:31 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/bridg/14704/9 "2007-11-17T20:31:41Z")

</div>

It is only a test of the stupid GMail system. Do not adjust your  
sets!!!!!!!
