# Archetype Industry Sprint update

**URL:** <https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376>\
**Category:** Clinical (archive)\
**Created:** [28 June 2015 09:04 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376 "2015-06-28T09:04:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![heather.leslie](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/heather.leslie/32/1980_2.png) [@heather.leslie](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/heather.leslie)\
**Post date:** [28 June 2015 09:04 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376/1 "2015-06-28T09:04:25Z")

</div>

Hi everyone,

Just a quick update to let you know the wiki pages for the archetype sprint have been updated today.

We are very privileged to have an extraordinary team of volunteer reviewers who have participated to date.

As a result of their collective efforts, 5 archetypes have been published in just the past week - the culmination of months of effort and collaboration across 3 CKMs (in a number of cases) and an extraordinary effort from each one of our dedicated reviewers. Take a look at the latest, shiny published archetypes for:

\* Procedure\<[http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype\_1013.1.204&gt](http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.204&gt);

\* Problem/Diagnosis\<[http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype\_1013.1.169&gt](http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.169&gt);

\* Goal\<[http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype\_1013.1.124&gt](http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.124&gt);

\* Recommendation\<[http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype\_1013.1.1380&gt](http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.1380&gt);

\* Report\<[http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype\_1013.1.677&gt](http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.677&gt);  
Plus Problem List\<[http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype\_1013.1.287&gt](http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.287&gt); & Story/History\<[http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype\_1013.1.68&gt](http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.68&gt); published since mid May

The FHIR Adverse Reaction archetype proceeds, despite at a slower pace than we'd prefer, but it is on the move again and the current review round is due for completion on July 3.

The summary of the sprint can be viewed here: [https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=2949155](https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=2949155)

The details are here: [https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/healthmod/Proposed+archetypes+for+'Industry+Sprint'+Publication](https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/healthmod/Proposed+archetypes+for+%27Industry+Sprint%27+Publication)

Thanks to everyone involved

Regards

Heather

Dr Heather Leslie  
MBBS FRACGP FACHI  
Consulting Lead, Ocean Informatics\<[http://www.oceaninformatics.com/&gt](http://www.oceaninformatics.com/&gt);  
Clinical Programme Lead, openEHR Foundation\<[http://www.openehr.org/&gt](http://www.openehr.org/&gt);  
Phone - +61 418 966 670  
Skype - heatherleslie  
Twitter - @omowizard

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [29 June 2015 12:03 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376/2 "2015-06-29T12:03:51Z")

</div>

Hi Heather,

Many, many thanks for the hard work that you and others have put into this. It is great to see those green ticks go up 🙂

Ian

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marcusbaw](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/marcusbaw/32/4792_2.png) [@marcusbaw](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/marcusbaw)\
**Post date:** [30 June 2015 08:28 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376/3 "2015-06-30T08:28:28Z")

</div>

excellent work Heather and team!

Marcus

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [1 July 2015 09:14 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376/4 "2015-07-01T09:14:35Z")

</div>

Great to see this! Congratulations!

Mate

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [1 July 2015 09:50 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376/5 "2015-07-01T09:50:00Z")

</div>

These are really useful and very timely as we kick off trying to agree a summary of primary care data for NHS Scotland. As many of you know our challenge is one of education and acceptance as much as clinical content definitions, but having something for the latter certainly helps!

Paul

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Koray\_Atalag](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/koray_atalag/32/70_2.png) [@Koray\_Atalag](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Koray_Atalag)\
**Post date:** [1 July 2015 10:03 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376/6 "2015-07-01T10:03:01Z")

</div>

It’s an absolute joy to see those green ticks popping up on CKM – well done Heather et al. and all contributors!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [1 July 2015 10:55 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376/7 "2015-07-01T10:55:55Z")

</div>

Thanks Paul,

Just for information (and I’m sure you know this already) .. we are able to pull in and use these international archetypes in the setting of our UK-CKM free-of-charge. The only limitation would be if we decided to ‘fork’ them i.e copy and take under our control, when they would count towards the licence limit.

I will get round to updating the ‘remote domain’ in UK CKM to reflect these new publications ASAP.

Ian

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://discourse.openehr.org/uploads/default/original/2X/f/f0a1dedb20c42747bddcafd6c7df9db5f34f003c.svg) [@system](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [1 July 2015 11:25 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376/8 "2015-07-01T11:25:47Z")

</div>

A quick look makes me think they could be templated to meet diagnosis / procedure and problem list requirements without too much hassle, but the technical stuff is not the blockage as you know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tonyshannon](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/tonyshannon/32/528_2.png) [@tonyshannon](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/tonyshannon)\
**Post date:** [1 July 2015 16:04 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/archetype-industry-sprint-update/15376/9 "2015-07-01T16:04:47Z")

</div>

Great to see the march of progress in this effort..  
Thanks+

Tony