# Antw: Re: Open Source EHR at the Americal Academy of    Family Physicians ...

**URL:** https://discourse.openehr.org/t/antw-re-open-source-ehr-at-the-americal-academy-of-family-physicians/15768
**Category:** Technical (archive)
**Created:** [26 September 2003 01:33 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/antw-re-open-source-ehr-at-the-americal-academy-of-family-physicians/15768 "2003-09-26T01:33:15Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tim\_Churches](https://discourse.openehr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Tim\_Churches](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/Tim_Churches)
#### Post date: [26 September 2003 01:33 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/antw-re-open-source-ehr-at-the-americal-academy-of-family-physicians/15768/1 "2003-09-26T01:33:15Z")

</div>

---snip----

I said clearly that that was a completely naive and inadequate search strategy - I  
was just pointing out that Google is not the right place to look when it comes to  
the biomedical literature.

Evaluation of SNOMED CT and other classifications/terminologies cuts across  
many biomedical disciplines, including medical/nursing/public health informatics,  
clinical medicine and clinical nursing, epidemiology, computer science etc. But  
not IT.

Tim C