# Allowing open name constraint to support formal FOLDER models, why not?

**URL:** <https://discourse.openehr.org/t/allowing-open-name-constraint-to-support-formal-folder-models-why-not/11804>\
**Category:** ADL\
**Created:** [5 March 2026 04:43 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/allowing-open-name-constraint-to-support-formal-folder-models-why-not/11804 "2026-03-05T04:43:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![siljelb](https://discourse.openehr.org/user_avatar/discourse.openehr.org/siljelb/32/12_2.png) [@siljelb](https://discourse.openehr.org/u/siljelb)\
**Post date:** [5 March 2026 08:01 UTC](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/allowing-open-name-constraint-to-support-formal-folder-models-why-not/11804/2 "2026-03-05T08:01:39Z")

</div>

Apologies if I’m misunderstanding your intent, but is this in any way related to this topic? [Coding element and event names - Specifications - openEHR](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/coding-element-and-event-names/1998/53)

We’ve asked for the ability to use DV\_CODED\_TEXT instead of just DV\_TEXT in node names for a while, but AFAIK not much has come out of it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.openehr.org/t/allowing-open-name-constraint-to-support-formal-folder-models-why-not/11804)._